PFAS in Drinking Water
Prepared by:
R & D Department of Olympian Water Testing™
Fact Checked by
Dr. Yasir A. Rehman PhD
Table of Contents
Introduction
PFAS contamination of drinking water has become a global issue. Manufacturing, usage, and disposal of PFAS-containing products, are primary sources of contamination. Additionally, the use of aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) by firefighting facilities, military installations, and airports has contributed significantly to PFAS releases into the environment.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of synthetic chemicals that have been widely used in various industrial and consumer products since the 1940s. Known for their unique properties such as resistance to heat, water, and oil, PFAS have found applications in non-stick cookware, water-repellent clothing, stain-resistant fabrics, firefighting foams, and many other products. However, these same properties that make PFAS so useful also make them highly persistent in the environment, leading to widespread contamination and raising significant public health and environmental concerns.
PFAS have brought significant advancements in industrial and consumer applications. However, accompanying this progress are mounting concerns regarding their environmental persistence, bioaccumulation, and potential adverse health effects, particularly in the context of drinking water contamination.
PFAS have a propensity for bioaccumulation, meaning they can accumulate in living organisms, including aquatic species and humans, through the food chain. This bioaccumulative potential raises concerns about long-term exposure and associated health risks.
Research has linked PFAS exposure to a myriad of adverse health effects, including developmental delays, immune system disorders, liver toxicity, and certain cancers. Of particular concern are vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, infants, and individuals living in proximity to contaminated sites.
Accurate detection and measurement of PFAS in drinking water and environmental samples require advanced analytical techniques capable of identifying numerous PFAS compounds at trace levels. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has emerged as a preferred method for its sensitivity and selectivity, enabling comprehensive analysis of PFAS contamination.
The pervasive presence of PFAS in drinking water presents a multifaceted challenge with profound implications for public health and environmental stewardship. By fostering collaboration among stakeholders, advancing scientific knowledge, and implementing proactive measures, we can work towards mitigating PFAS contamination and safeguarding the health and well-being of communities worldwide.
Sources of PFAS in Drinking Water
A. Industrial Discharges
PFAS can enter drinking water sources through industrial discharges from facilities that manufacture or use these chemicals. These facilities release PFAS into the environment during the production process, where they can seep into groundwater or surface water.
Chemical Plants
Facilities involved in the production of PFAS-related products, such as non-stick cookware, waterproof clothing, and firefighting foams, often discharge these chemicals directly into nearby water bodies or through their waste streams.
Textile and Paper Industries
PFAS are used to create stain-resistant fabrics and grease-proof paper products. Wastewater from these industries can contain significant levels of PFAS, which can contaminate local water supplies if not properly treated. (2)
Electronics Manufacturing
PFAS are utilized in the electronics industry for their insulating properties. Discharges from electronics manufacturing processes can also be a source of PFAS contamination in water sources. (3)
B. Firefighting Foams
Firefighting foams, particularly aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF), are a major source of PFAS contamination in drinking water. These foams contain PFAS to rapidly suppress fires, especially those involving flammable liquids.
- Military Bases: AFFF has been widely used in military bases for training exercises and emergency response. The runoff from these activities can lead to significant PFAS contamination of groundwater and surface water near the bases.
- Airports: Similar to military bases, airports use AFFF for firefighting and training. PFAS from these foams can seep into the soil and contaminate nearby water supplies, affecting both municipal water sources and private wells.
- Firefighting Training Facilities: Firefighting training sites regularly use AFFF, leading to the accumulation of PFAS in the surrounding environment. This can result in localized but severe contamination of groundwater sources. (4)
C. Landfills and Wastewater Treatment Plants
Landfills receive a variety of waste materials, including consumer products containing PFAS. Over time, PFAS can leach from these products into the landfill leachate, which may then contaminate groundwater if not adequately managed.
Wastewater treatment plants process sewage and industrial wastewater, which can contain PFAS from various sources. Standard treatment processes are often ineffective at removing PFAS, leading to the discharge of contaminated effluent into water bodies. (5)
Industrial facilities may have their own wastewater treatment processes. However, these systems may also struggle to effectively remove PFAS, resulting in the release of contaminated water into the environment.
Environmental Persistence
& Bioaccumulation
A. Chemical Stability and Persistence
Resistance to Degradation
PFAS compounds are resistant to natural degradation processes such as photolysis, hydrolysis, and biodegradation. This resistance means they can remain in soil, water, and sediments for years without breaking down.
Environmental Half-Lives
The environmental half-lives of PFAS can vary, but many common PFAS, such as perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), have half-lives that span several years to decades, indicating their long-term persistence in various environmental media. (6)
Widespread Environmental Presence
Due to their persistence, PFAS are found globally in diverse environments, including remote areas far from direct sources of pollution. This widespread distribution is facilitated by atmospheric transport and water currents, leading to their presence in even the most pristine ecosystems.
B. Bioaccumulation in the Food Chain
Mechanisms of Bioaccumulation
PFAS are absorbed by organisms primarily through ingestion of contaminated water and food. Once inside the body, PFAS bind to proteins rather than fats, leading to their accumulation in blood, liver, and other tissues.
Impact on Wildlife
Wildlife, particularly top predators such as fish, birds, and mammals, can accumulate high levels of PFAS through their diet. Studies have shown significant concentrations of PFAS in various species, which can affect their health and reproductive success. (7)
Human Exposure through the Food Chain
Humans can be exposed to PFAS by consuming contaminated water and food, such as fish and shellfish from polluted waters. This exposure can lead to bioaccumulation in human tissues, raising concerns about potential health effects from chronic low-level exposure.
Health Impacts of PFAS
B. Bioaccumulation in the Food Chain
PFAS has been linked to a variety of adverse health effects in humans. These effects are concerning due to the widespread presence of PFAS in the environment and their ability to accumulate in the human body over time.
Carcinogenicity: Studies have shown that exposure to certain PFAS, such as perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), is associated with an increased risk of certain cancers, including kidney and testicular cancer. Epidemiological studies among exposed populations have provided evidence supporting these associations.
Hormonal Disruption and Endocrine Effects: PFAS can interfere with the endocrine system, leading to hormonal imbalances. Research indicates that PFAS exposure can affect thyroid hormone levels, potentially leading to thyroid disease. Disruptions in hormone levels can have wide-ranging effects on metabolism, growth, and development.
Immunological Impacts: PFAS exposure has been linked to immune system suppression, making individuals more susceptible to infections and reducing the efficacy of vaccines. Studies have found that higher levels of PFAS in the blood are associated with lower antibody responses to vaccinations in children. (8)
Regulatory Standards and Guidelines
A. United States
Regulatory agencies in the United States, such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), have established guidelines and standards to manage and limit PFAS contamination in drinking water and the environment.
EPA Health Advisories
The EPA has issued lifetime health advisories for two common PFAS compounds, PFOA and PFOS, setting a combined advisory level at 70 parts per trillion (ppt) in drinking water. This advisory is based on the potential health risks associated with long-term exposure to these chemicals.
State Regulations
Various states have established their own regulatory standards for PFAS in drinking water, often more stringent than federal guidelines. For instance, New Jersey has set maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for PFOA at 14 ppt and PFOS at 13 ppt, reflecting growing concerns about PFAS toxicity.
Federal Legislation
The U.S. Congress has also taken steps to address PFAS contamination. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) includes provisions for PFAS monitoring and remediation, particularly at military sites. Additionally, the proposed PFAS Action Act aims to designate PFAS as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), facilitating their cleanup.
Current level of PFAS in different states of USA is shown in chart below: (10)
B. European Union
Under the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation, several PFAS compounds are subject to stringent restrictions. REACH aims to protect human health and the environment by ensuring that chemicals are produced and used safely across the EU.
The EU Drinking Water Directive (Directive (EU) 2020/2184) includes provisions for monitoring and limiting PFAS concentrations in drinking water. The directive sets a parametric value of 0.1 µg/L (100 ppt) for the sum of 20 specific PFAS, aiming to ensure the safety of drinking water supplies.
The EU has included certain PFAS, such as PFOS, in the list of persistent organic pollutants under the POPs Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019 / 1021). This regulation aims to eliminate or restrict the production and use of substances that persist in the environment and pose significant health risks.
Detection and Measurement
of PFAS in Drinking Water
A. Analytical Methods
Detecting and measuring PFAS in drinking water requires sensitive and accurate analytical methods due to the low concentration levels at which these chemicals are typically present.
Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS):
LC-MS/MS is the most commonly used technique for detecting and quantifying PFAS in drinking water. This method combines the separation capabilities of liquid chromatography with the detection capabilities of mass spectrometry, allowing for the precise identification and quantification of various PFAS compounds even at low parts-per-trillion (ppt) levels. (12)
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC):
HPLC, often coupled with mass spectrometry, is another effective technique for PFAS analysis. This method separates PFAS based on their chemical properties before detection. It is highly sensitive and can differentiate between different PFAS compounds, making it suitable for complex water samples. (13)
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS):
Although less commonly used for PFAS due to their high boiling points and thermal stability, GC-MS can be applied for specific PFAS compounds after derivatization. This method involves converting PFAS into more volatile compounds that can be analyzed by GC-MS, providing an alternative analytical approach. (14)
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Chromatography (HPLC)
Spectrometry (GC-MS)
B. Sampling and Pre-Treatment
Proper sampling and pre-treatment of water samples are crucial steps to ensure accurate PFAS detection and measurement.
Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE):
SPE is a widely used pre-treatment technique that concentrates PFAS from large volumes of water by passing the sample through a cartridge containing a sorbent material. This method enhances the detection sensitivity of subsequent analytical techniques by removing interfering substances and concentrating PFAS. (15)
Activated Carbon Filtration:
Activated carbon can be used to adsorb PFAS from water samples. This pre-treatment method helps in reducing the matrix effects that can interfere with PFAS analysis, improving the accuracy and reliability of the results. (16)
Field Sampling Protocols:
Accurate PFAS measurement begins with proper field sampling protocols. This includes using PFAS-free containers, avoiding Teflon-coated materials, and preventing sample contamination from common sources like sunscreen or insect repellent. Following stringent sampling protocols ensures the integrity of water samples from collection to analysis. (17)
C. Standardized Testing Procedures
Standardized testing procedures are essential for consistent and reliable PFAS measurement across different laboratories and studies. These methods help ensure that results are comparable and reproducible, which is crucial for regulatory assessments and public health decisions. For those seeking to understand the landscape of available options, a pfas testing services overview can provide vital insights into the methodologies, certifications, and capabilities of various providers in the field. By adhering to these standards, laboratories can enhance the credibility of their findings and contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of PFAS contamination. Moreover, the integration of advanced technologies and state-of-the-art equipment in PFAS testing laboratory services plays a significant role in improving detection limits and accuracy. Continuous training and certification of laboratory personnel are also vital to maintaining high testing standards and ensuring the integrity of the results. As communities increasingly demand transparency and accountability regarding PFAS contamination, the importance of standardized testing procedures and reliable PFAS testing laboratory services cannot be overstated.
EPA Method 537 is a standardized method for the determination of selected PFAS in drinking water using SPE and LC-MS/MS. This method specifies procedures for sample collection, preparation, and analysis, providing a consistent framework for PFAS detection. (18)
EPA Method 537 is a standardized method for the determination of selected PFAS in drinking water using SPE and LC-MS/MS. This method specifies procedures for sample collection, preparation, and analysis, providing a consistent framework for PFAS detection.
The ASTM D7979-20 standard outlines a test method for determining PFAS in water, sludge, influent, effluent, and wastewater by LC-MS/MS. This method is applicable to a wide range of matrices and PFAS compounds, providing a versatile tool for environmental monitoring.
Treatment Methods for PFAS Removal
A. Granular Activated Carbon (GAC)
Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) is a widely used method for removing PFAS from water due to its high adsorption capacity and effectiveness for various PFAS compounds.
Mechanism and Efficacy
GAC works by adsorbing PFAS molecules onto its porous surface, effectively reducing their concentration in water. This method is particularly effective for long-chain PFAS like PFOA and PFOS due to their higher affinity for carbon surfaces.
Application in Drinking Water Treatment
GAC filters are commonly used in municipal water treatment facilities to remove PFAS from drinking water. Studies have shown that GAC can achieve significant reductions in PFAS concentrations, though its efficacy can vary depending on the specific PFAS and water chemistry. (19)
B. Ion Exchange Resins
The Cape Fear River basin in North Carolina is another prominent example of PFAS contamination, primarily from industrial sources, leading to extensive environmental and public health concerns.
Background and Source of Contamination
The Chemours Fayetteville Works facility was identified as a significant source of PFAS, particularly GenX and other related compounds, which were discharged into the Cape Fear River. This river serves as a drinking water source for several communities downstream.
Community and Health Impacts
Extensive testing revealed widespread PFAS contamination in the river and affected communities’ drinking water supplies. Health studies have been initiated to understand the exposure effects, and local authorities have invested in upgrading water treatment infrastructure to ensure safe drinking water. (20)
C. Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs)
The Veneto Region in Italy has faced significant PFAS contamination issues, primarily attributed to industrial activities, leading to extensive public health and environmental initiatives.
Background and Source of Contamination
The contamination in Veneto was traced to a chemical manufacturing plant in the municipality of Trissino, which produced PFAS and discharged waste into local water bodies. This resulted in widespread contamination of surface water, groundwater, and drinking water supplies across the region .
Government and Regulatory Response
Italian authorities, along with regional agencies, initiated comprehensive monitoring and remediation programs. This included setting strict regulatory limits for PFAS in drinking water and implementing advanced water treatment solutions to reduce contamination levels .(21)
Case Studies & Real-World Examples
A. Decatur, Alabama
Decatur, Alabama, provides a significant case study on PFAS contamination due to industrial activities, highlighting the challenges and responses involved in addressing widespread pollution.
Background and Source of Contamination
In Decatur, PFAS contamination was linked to industrial discharges from facilities that manufactured or used PFAS-containing products. The Tennessee River, which supplies drinking water to the area, was found to have elevated levels of PFAS, prompting health and environmental concerns.
Response and Remediation Efforts
The local water utility implemented measures to reduce PFAS levels in drinking water, including the installation of advanced filtration systems such as granular activated carbon (GAC). These efforts significantly reduced PFAS concentrations but required substantial financial investment and ongoing monitoring.
Health and Environmental Impact Studies
Studies conducted in the area have shown that residents had elevated levels of PFAS in their blood, correlating with the contamination in their water supply. Ongoing health monitoring and research are being conducted to assess the long-term impacts of PFAS exposure on the local population. (22)
B. Cape Fear River, North Carolina
The Cape Fear River basin in North Carolina is another prominent example of PFAS contamination, primarily from industrial sources, leading to extensive environmental and public health concerns.
Background and Source of Contamination
The Chemours Fayetteville Works facility was identified as a significant source of PFAS, particularly GenX and other related compounds, which were discharged into the Cape Fear River. This river serves as a drinking water source for several communities downstream.
Legal and Regulatory Actions
Regulatory agencies, including the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), took legal action against Chemours, resulting in consent orders requiring the company to halt PFAS discharges and implement remediation measures. This included installing advanced treatment technologies to reduce PFAS levels in the river.
Community and Health Impacts
Extensive testing revealed widespread PFAS contamination in the river and affected communities' drinking water supplies. Health studies have been initiated to understand the exposure effects, and local authorities have invested in upgrading water treatment infrastructure to ensure safe drinking water. (23)
C. Veneto Region, Italy
The Veneto Region in Italy has faced significant PFAS contamination issues, primarily attributed to industrial activities, leading to extensive public health and environmental initiatives.
Background and Source of Contamination
The contamination in Veneto was traced to a chemical manufacturing plant in the municipality of Trissino, which produced PFAS and discharged waste into local water bodies. This resulted in widespread contamination of surface water, groundwater, and drinking water supplies across the region .
Government and Regulatory Response
Italian authorities, along with regional agencies, initiated comprehensive monitoring and remediation programs. This included setting strict regulatory limits for PFAS in drinking water and implementing advanced water treatment solutions to reduce contamination levels .
Health Surveillance and Research
The Veneto Region has conducted extensive health surveillance programs to monitor PFAS exposure among the local population. These studies have revealed elevated PFAS levels in residents' blood and potential health impacts, prompting ongoing research and public health initiatives to address the issue. (24)
Future Directions & Research Needs
A. Understanding the Full Spectrum of PFAS Compounds
While considerable research has been conducted on certain well-known PFAS compounds, such as PFOA and PFOS, there are thousands of other PFAS compounds with limited data on their occurrence, behavior, and impacts.
Comprehensive Identification
There is a critical need for the development of comprehensive analytical methods capable of identifying and quantifying the full spectrum of PFAS compounds in various environmental matrices. Expanding the scope of PFAS compounds studied will provide a clearer picture of environmental contamination and human exposure. (25)
Toxicological Profiles
Detailed toxicological studies are required for a broader range of PFAS compounds to understand their health impacts better. This includes chronic exposure studies, reproductive and developmental toxicity assessments, and evaluations of potential carcinogenicity.
Environmental Fate and Transport
Further research is needed to elucidate the environmental fate and transport mechanisms of different PFAS compounds. This includes understanding how PFAS migrate through soil and water systems, their persistence, and their potential to bioaccumulate in wildlife and humans.
B. Advanced Treatment Technologies
Developing and optimizing treatment technologies for PFAS removal from water, soil, and air is essential to mitigate exposure and protect public health.
Innovative Filtration Methods
Research should focus on advancing filtration technologies such as nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and novel adsorbents. These methods need to be evaluated for their effectiveness in removing a wide range of PFAS compounds and for their operational costs and environmental impacts. (26)
Destruction Technologies
Developing technologies capable of breaking down PFAS into non-toxic byproducts is crucial. Advanced oxidation processes, electrochemical treatments, and plasma-based methods are promising areas that require further exploration to assess their feasibility and scalability .
Sustainable Approaches
There is a need for sustainable and cost-effective treatment solutions, particularly for low-income and rural communities. This includes exploring natural and low-energy treatment options such as biochar and phytoremediation .
C. Regulatory and Policy Frameworks
Improving regulatory frameworks and policies at the local, national, and international levels is essential to manage PFAS contamination effectively.
Standardized Guidelines
Developing standardized guidelines for PFAS testing, monitoring, and reporting is critical. This includes setting uniform maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for PFAS in drinking water and other environmental media, as well as harmonizing methodologies for PFAS analysis.
Global Coordination
International cooperation and information sharing are necessary to tackle PFAS pollution on a global scale. This involves aligning regulatory approaches, sharing best practices, and supporting countries with limited resources in their efforts to address PFAS contamination.
Lifecycle Management
Policies should focus on managing PFAS throughout their lifecycle, from production and use to disposal. This includes promoting the development and use of safer alternatives, implementing producer responsibility programs, and establishing guidelines for the safe disposal of PFAS-containing materials.
D. Public Health and Community Engagement
Engaging communities and public health professionals in addressing PFAS contamination is crucial for effective risk communication and management.
Health Surveillance Programs
Implementing long-term health surveillance programs in PFAS-affected areas can help monitor exposure levels and associated health outcomes. These programs should be designed to provide actionable data to inform public health interventions and policies. (27)
Risk Communication
Developing effective risk communication strategies to inform and educate communities about PFAS risks and mitigation measures is essential. This includes transparent reporting of contamination levels, potential health impacts, and guidance on reducing exposure.
Community Involvement
Involving communities in decision-making processes related to PFAS management can enhance trust and cooperation. This includes participatory approaches to monitoring and remediation efforts, as well as ensuring that community concerns are addressed in policy development.
E. Research and Development Funding
Sustained and increased funding for PFAS research and development is essential to drive innovation and solutions.
Interdisciplinary Research
Supporting interdisciplinary research that combines environmental science, chemistry, toxicology, engineering, and public health can lead to holistic solutions for PFAS contamination. Collaborative efforts between academia, industry, and government agencies are crucial. (28)
Pilot Projects and Field Studies
Investing in pilot projects and field studies to test and validate new treatment technologies and remediation strategies in real-world settings can accelerate their development and deployment. These projects provide valuable data and practical insights for scaling up successful approaches.
Public-Private Partnerships
Encouraging public-private partnerships can leverage resources and expertise from both sectors to address PFAS challenges. Such collaborations can facilitate the translation of research findings into practical applications and policies.
Conclusion
Olympian Water Testing is ensuring the safety of drinking water, renowned for its cutting-edge technologies and comprehensive testing solutions. The company utilizes state-of-the-art technology to enhance detection sensitivity by concentrating PFAS from large water volumes.
As an industry leader, Olympian Water Testing adheres to high regulatory standards, including EPA Method 537 and ASTM D7979-20. The company invests heavily in research and development to stay ahead of emerging contaminants and engages with communities to educate and empower them about PFAS risks.
Olympian Water Testing has a proven track record of success, demonstrated through its involvement in high-profile projects. Olympian Water Testing is committed to expanding its analytical capabilities by investing in new technologies and partnering with only the very top industry professionals for better detection and fostering global collaboration to standardize PFAS testing methods and share best practices.
Additionally, the company is exploring sustainable solutions for PFAS removal, such as eco-friendly methods. Olympian Water Testing’s dedication to excellence, innovation, and community engagement makes it a trusted partner in addressing PFAS contamination and ensuring safe drinking water. Through continuous innovation and collaboration, the company aims to protect public health and the environment for future generations.
The presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in drinking water is a serious environmental and public health challenge. These compounds, renowned for their durability and widespread use in industrial and consumer products, have become persistent contaminants that have significant risks to ecosystems and human health.
The review of PFAS sources highlights the extensive contamination arising from industrial activities, firefighting foams, and consumer products. Their environmental persistence and bioaccumulation further enhance the problem, ensuring that PFAS remain in the environment and in human bodies for extended periods.
The health impacts of PFAS are serious including cancer, hormone disruption, and immune system effects. Regulatory standards and guidelines are evolving to address these risks.
Detection and measurement of PFAS in drinking water require advanced analytical techniques to accurately identify and quantify these compounds, given their chemical diversity and low concentration levels in environmental samples.
Effective treatment methods, including granular activated carbon, ion exchange resins, and advanced oxidation processes, have been developed, yet ongoing innovation and optimization are essential to enhance efficiency and reduce costs.
Understanding the full spectrum of PFAS compounds, developing advanced and sustainable treatment technologies, strengthening regulatory frameworks, and fostering public health and community engagement are critical steps. Continued research and development, supported by funding and international cooperation, will be helpful in mitigating PFAS contamination and protecting public health and the environment.
Tackling PFAS contamination is an urgent global imperative. Through serious efforts encompassing science, policy, and community action, it is possible to mitigate the impacts of these persistent pollutants and safeguard drinking water quality for current and future generations.
References
1- https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/2023/11/07/pfas-the-chemistry-of-concealment/
2- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380916/
3- https://www.epa.gov/pfas/pfas-explained
4- https://cleanwater.org/pfas-containing-firefighting-foams#:~:text=AFFF%20are%20synthetic%20PFAS%2Dcontaining,California%20and%20around%20the%20world.
5- https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es1036173
6..https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7784706/#:~:text=The%20vast%20majority%20of%20PFAS,very%20persistent%20substances%20(vP).
7- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9384792/
8..https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/hazardous/docs/pfashealth.pdf
9..https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/hazardous/docs/pfashealth.pdf
10- https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/water/1168584/pfas-update-state-by-state-regulation-of-pfas-substances-in-drinking-water
11- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353822791_Destruction_of_Per-_and_Polyfluoroalkyl_Substances_PFAS_via_Lacasse_Enzymatic_Degradation_and_Electrochemical_Advanced_Oxidation?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6Il9kaXJlY3QiLCJwYWdlIjoiX2RpcmVjdCJ9fQ
12- https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?Lab=NERL&direntryid=198984
13- https://www.canva.com/design/DAGGf-05ToM/JpASz-DdIPGV3Rf_hN4g_w/edit
14-https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18791652/
15-https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47754982_Determination_of_perfluorochemicals_in_biological_environmental_and_food_samples_by_an_automated_on-line_solid_phase_extraction_ultra_high_performance_liquid_chromatography_tandem_mass_spectrometry_me
16-https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28478297/
17-https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25108894/
18- https://www.epa.gov/pfas/epa-pfas-drinking-water-laboratory-methods
19-https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24216232/
20-https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349059642_PFAS_removal_by_ion_exchange_resins_A_review
21-https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/rem.21553
22-https://www.tennesseeriverkeeper.org/
23-https://www.deq.nc.gov/news/press-releases/2022/09/15/deq-approves-permit-reduce-pfas-contamination-cape-fear-river
24-https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/28/1/180/3852033
25-https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-018-0134-4
26-https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/rem.21553
27-https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30622333/
28-https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-01/documents/pfas_action_plan_feb2020.pdf
