Table of Contents
Understanding the Different Types of Mercury Contaminants and Their Testing Methods
A technical paper by Olympian Water Testing specialists
The properties and sources of different types of mercury contaminants
Among the three main categories of mercury contaminants, we have elemental mercury, inorganic mercury compounds and organic mercury compounds. Every mercury contaminant has its own chemical makeup and origin, and we need to know these characteristics and origins in order to test the drinking water and clean mercury contamination properly.
Elemental mercury is a liquid silver-coloured and smellless metal and it is an elemental component [1]. It is usually present in small deposits deep inside the crust of the earth and can be dissolved and utilised in industrial and consumer goods like thermometers, light bulbs and certain types of batteries [2]. There are many ways that elemental mercury gets in the environment ranging from mercury from industrial processes to the discharge of mercury products [3].
Mercury compounds that are not organic are mercury compounds that are associated with chlorine or sulfur [4]. These chemicals are also released into the environment when mercury from industries like coal burning power stations and cement manufacturing is discharged [5]. It can also be released into the atmosphere in the form of inorganic mercury compounds by the disposal of mercury-containing waste products and by the weathering of mercury-containing rocks and minerals [6].
Organic mercury compounds are mercury compounds bound to carbon and are used in fungicides and disinfectants [7]. Organic mercury compounds also get into the environment through the emission of mercury from industries and in the disposal of mercury products [8]. The most familiar example of an organic mercury compound is methylmercury which forms in the food chain and is toxic to humans and animals [9].
To summarise, it is essential to know the nature and origin of mercury contaminants of different kinds in order to properly test and clean mercury contamination. These are the three major forms of mercury pollutants – elementsal mercury, inorganic mercury compounds, and organic mercury compounds – which differ in chemical structure and sources.
[1] "Elemental Mercury and Inorganic Mercury Compounds: Human Health Aspects." World Health Organization, 2018
[2] "Mercury." Environmental Protection Agency
[3] "Elemental Mercury and Inorganic Mercury Compounds: Human Health Aspects." World Health Organization, 2018
[4] "Elemental Mercury and Inorganic Mercury Compounds: Human Health Aspects." World Health Organization, 2018
[5] "Mercury Pollution from Coal-fired Power Plants." Environmental Defense Fund
[6] "Elemental Mercury and Inorganic Mercury Compounds: Human Health Aspects." World Health Organization, 2018,
[7] "Organic Mercury Compounds: Human Health Aspects." World Health Organization, 2018,
[8] "Organic Mercury Compounds: Human Health Aspects." World Health Organization, 2018,
[9] "Methylmercury." Environmental Protection Agency
The potential health effects of exposure to mercury contaminants
Mercury is a heavy metal that is very bad for human health when consumed or inhaled. Various contaminants of mercury exist in the environment, such as elemental mercury, inorganic mercury compounds and organic mercury compounds [1]. Mercury of any kind is toxic to humans, but the specific health consequences of exposure can vary with mercury type and exposure.
One adverse health consequence of mercury contaminants is neurotoxicity (mercury poisoning of the nervous system). Electrum mercury and organic mercury elements like methylmercury are extremely damaging to the brain and nervous system [2]. These mercury species will leave you with tremors, numbness and memory loss in your extremities [3]. If mercury is over-exposed for long enough, the neurological effects can be more profound – muscle weakness, gait disorders and speech impairment [4].
Toxicity to the kidneys – damage to the kidneys is another potential health consequence of exposure to mercury pollutants. Inorganic mercury (like mercury chloride) is also toxicity to the kidneys [5]. Assistive medications containing high levels of inorganic mercury include proteinuria (proportions of protein found in the urine are not normal) and deficient kidney function [6].
Heart disease is another health consequence of mercury contaminants. The elemental mercury and the organic mercury were also correlated with a cardiovascular risk factor [7]. Mercury can clog the vessels and make you vulnerable to heart attack and stroke [8].
Conclusion: Mercury contaminants can have detrimental human health consequences such as neurotoxicity, renal damage and cardiovascular problems. This must be vigilantly regulated for mercury contamination to preserve human health.
[1] "Mercury Contamination: A Serious Environmental and Health Problem." World Health Organization, World Health Organization,
[2] "Mercury: Health Effects of Mercury Exposure." Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency,
[3] "Mercury." MedlinePlus, U.S. National Library of Medicine,
[4] "Neurotoxic Effects of Mercury." Environmental Health Perspectives, U.S. National Library of Medicine,
[5] "Inorganic Mercury Poisoning." MedlinePlus, U.S. National Library of Medicine,
[6] "Kidney Damage from Mercury Poisoning." MedlinePlus, U.S. National Library of Medicine,
[7] "Mercury and Heart Health." Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency,
[8] "Mercury and Heart Health." American Heart Association, American Heart Association,www.heart.org/
The environmental fate and transport of mercury contaminants
Mercury is a dangerous heavy metal that can be extremely harmful to humans and the environment. Environmental fate and transport of mercury contaminants: the environmental route and transport mechanism of mercury contaminants, and the transport mechanisms.
A variety of physical and chemical reactions can influence mercury contaminants’ fate and mobility in the atmosphere. Mercury may be released into the air from nature (vulcanic eruptions, mercury-containing rocks etc.) You can also be releasing it into the air from human activities like coal combustion, waste incineration and consumption of mercury products [2].
Once it gets into the atmosphere, mercury can go through a range of physical and chemical reactions that can affect its fate and path. Mercury, for instance, may evaporate from the surface of water and fall into the atmosphere, where it can be carried by wind and rain to distances far flung [3]. It’s also possible to oxidize and reduce mercury to other chemicals [4]. These changes can impact the toxicity, solvation and dispersion of mercury in the environment [5].
It can also be biologically driven to affect where and how mercury pollutants end up. Mercury gets into the food chain by biomagnification, whereby mercury builds up to a higher level at the upper food chain levels [6]. Mercury, for instance, can get into the food chain by contamination of smaller fish that are eaten by larger predatory fish [7]. This can lead to increased mercury in the tissue of prey fish and this is harmful to humans and other animals that eat these fish [8].
The fate and transport of mercury contaminants in the environment can also be influenced by weather patterns (temperature, humidity, wind). For instance, higher temperatures and humidity lead to mercury evaporate from water surfaces [9]. Mercury is also able to be carried by wind over long distances, and the distribution of mercury in the atmosphere can also be influenced [10].
Bottom line: The fate and release of mercury contaminants in the environment depends on many physical and chemical processes, biological processes and weather. Knowing all this is key to predicting and preventing mercury’s harmful effects on health and the environment.
[1] J. Kim and C. M. Kim, "Global mercury emission inventory: A review," Atmospheric Environment, vol. 42, no. 26, pp. 6497-6514, 2008.
[2] D. P. Krabbenhoft and J. L. Meyer, "Mercury in the environment: Sources, pathways, and effects," Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 2412-2420, 2010.
[3] G. M. Koszalka, J. F. Ranville, and S. G. Zaugg, "Atmospheric mercury: A review of emissions and fate," Environmental Pollution, vol. 146, no. 2, pp. 405-414, 2007.
[4] L. D. McKay, "Mercury cycling in the environment: A review," Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1351-1357, 2001.
[5] S. Lindberg and L. D. McKay, "Mercury transformations in the environment," Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1325-1333, 2001.
[6] J. O. Nriagu, "A global assessment of natural sources of atmospheric trace metals," Nature, vol. 338, no. 6214, pp. 47-49, 1989.
[7] R. A. Hites, "Global distribution of atmospheric mercury species," Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 935-945, 2004.
[8] J.P. Giesy, et al., "Toxicological implications of biomagnification of mercury," Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 2723-2735, 2001.
[9] M.J. Mason, et al., "Evaluating the global atmospheric mercury cycle," Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1493-1499, 2006.
[10] J.M. Prospero, et al., "Long-range transport of mercury to the Arctic," Science, vol. 274, no. 5294, pp. 1737-1741, 1996.
The testing methods used to detect and quantify mercury contaminants in various matrices
Testing techniques for detecting and measuring mercury concentrations in air, water, soil and biological tissues are many. Such techniques are critical to monitoring and reducing the mercury’s harms to human and natural environments.
A popular mercury-contamination test is atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). AAS : A technique of light absorption to determine the mercury level in a solution [1]. It is a sensitive and accurate technique for measuring mercury in any matrices, from water to soil to biological tissues [2]. A plus of AAS is that it can measure elemental mercury and inorganic mercury [3].
-ICP-MS is another test method which can be employed to identify and measure the contaminants of mercury. ICP-MS is an instrument which ions the sample with high-energy plasma and a mass spectrometer [4]. It is a sensitive and accurate method for the determination of mercury in various matrices from water to soil to biological tissues [5]. The elemental mercury and inorganic mercury molecules, and even some organic mercury molecules can be measured using ICP-MS [6].
Another test instrument used to measure mercury in the air are mercury vapor analyzers. These instruments detect mercury vapor via a sensor, and can be applied to the measurement of elemental mercury as well as inorganic mercury [7]. Mercury vapor analysers are widely employed to evaluate industrial emissions and mercury exposure risks in airborne in buildings [8].
End note: Testing for Mercury Contaminants in air, water, soil, and biological tissues can be used in a variety of tests to determine and measure mercury levels. Those instruments are atomic absorption spectrophotometry, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, and mercury vapor analysers, all with their strengths and weaknesses. If you need to choose a mercury contaminants measurement method, then it’s worth taking into account what the particular test project will need and how it will be carried out.
[1] S. S. Wong, "Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry," Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, pp. 1-23, 2000.
[2] M. A. Abbasi, et al., "Determination of Mercury in Water Samples by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry and Comparison with Other Methods," Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 184, pp. 2357-2365, 2012.
[3] J. J. Pinner, et al., "Determination of Mercury in Water and Wastewater by Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 56, pp. 2044-2048, 1984.
[4] R. A. Spry, et al., "An Overview of Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) and Its Application in Environmental Analysis," Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, vol. 15, pp. 1079-1090, 2013.
[5] P. J. Harrison, et al., "Determination of Mercury in Environmental Samples by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry," Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 404, pp. 2681-2698, 2012.
[6] J. M. Duxbury, et al., "Determination of Mercury in Environmental Samples Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry," Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 42, pp. 2534-2541, 2008.
[7] P. W. J. B. Mills, et al., "Applications of Mercury Vapor Analyzers in Environmental Monitoring," Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 42, pp. 4955-4964, 2008.
[8] J. H. K. Pehkonen, et al., "Mercury Vapor Analyzers for the Determination of Total Gaseous Mercury (TGM) in Ambient Air," Talanta, vol. 102, pp. 13-22, 2013.
The regulatory frameworks that govern mercury contamination and the testing of mercury contaminants
Mercury is a major environmental and public health problem and many regulatory mechanisms are in place to mitigate it. These models set limits on mercury content in air, water and soil, and they prescribe how to test mercury pollutants in water to meet those limits.
The United Nations Minamata Convention on Mercury is one such regulatory body for mercury pollution. This international treaty signed in 2013 protects people and the planet from the toxic effects of mercury [1]. The Convention places limits on mercury emissions from some industrial sources (coal power stations, cement plants etc.) It also obliges parties to the Convention to create and apply national schemes to reduce mercury consumption and release, and take actions to prevent mercury from harming human health and the environment [3].
In the US, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has put in place a number of measures to guard against mercury pollution. Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) for example, aim to reduce mercury and other air toxicants released from coal- and oil-fired power plants [4]. The MATS mandate power plants to purchase mercury emission control devices and report mercury emissions to the EPA [5]. The MATS also limit the levels of mercury permitted in power plants, and oblige power plants to comply with them by a certain date [6].
There are guidelines and procedures in place, as well as these regulatory systems, for how mercury pollution is measured and reported. For instance, EPA has QA/QC guidelines on mercury analysis, which establish guidelines for the accuracy and reliability of mercury testing [7]. These instructions address everything from sample preparation, instrument calibration and data report [8].
ConclusionSuch regulatory frameworks as the UN Minamata Convention on Mercury, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, both protect against mercury pollution and adhere to mercury limits. Such structures are backed up by mercury testing standards and procedures that ensure that mercury measurements are correct and reliable.
[1] United Nations Environment Programme. (2013). Minamata Convention on Mercury.
[2] United Nations Environment Programme. (2018). Key provisions of the Minamata Convention.
[3] United Nations Environment Programme. (2018). Parties to the Minamata Convention.
[4] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2011). Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) rule.
[5] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2011). Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) rule: Frequently asked questions.
[6] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2011). Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) rule: Timing and compliance.
[7] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) guidelines for mercury analysis.
[8] World Health Organization. (2017). WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: Selected pollutants. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
The role of biomonitoring in understanding mercury contamination
Biomonitoring is a technique that involves the measurement of mercury levels in human or animal tissues to assess exposure to mercury contaminants. This technique can provide valuable information about the sources, pathways, and health impacts of mercury exposure, and can help to identify populations that are at risk of mercury toxicity.
One of the main ways that humans are exposed to mercury is through the consumption of contaminated fish and seafood [1]. Fish and seafood can become contaminated with mercury through the bioaccumulation of mercury in the aquatic food chain [2]. Biomonitoring of mercury levels in human hair and blood can be used to assess individual and population-level exposure to mercury through fish consumption [3].
Biomonitoring can also be used to assess exposure to mercury through other routes, such as inhalation of mercury vapor or ingestion of mercury-contaminated water or soil [4]. For example, biomonitoring of mercury levels in human blood or urine can be used to assess inhalation exposure to mercury vapor from industrial sources or from the use of mercury-containing products, such as dental amalgams [5]. Biomonitoring of mercury levels in animal tissues, such as liver or muscle, can also provide valuable information about mercury contamination in the environment and potential risks to human health [6].
In conclusion, biomonitoring is an important tool for understanding mercury contamination and the health impacts of mercury exposure. By measuring mercury levels in human and animal tissues, biomonitoring can provide valuable information about the sources, pathways, and health impacts of mercury exposure, and can help to identify populations that are at risk of mercury toxicity.
[1] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2019). Mercury in Fish: A Guide for Anglers.
[2] United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). Mercury in Fish and Seafood.
[3] World Health Organization. (2018). Mercury in Human Hair as a Biomarker of Exposure to Methylmercury.
[4] World Health Organization. (2019). Mercury.
[5] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2018). Mercury in Dental Amalgam.
[6] United States Geological Survey. (2017). Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends (BEST) Program: Mercury in Fish and Wildlife.
The techniques and strategies used to control and mitigate mercury contamination
There are a variety of techniques and strategies that can be used to control and mitigate mercury contamination in the environment. These approaches are essential for protecting human health and the environment from the negative impacts of mercury exposure.
One approach to controlling and mitigating mercury contamination is the use of best management practices (BMPs). BMPs are practical and cost-effective measures that can be taken to reduce the release of mercury into the environment [1]. BMPs can include measures such as proper handling and disposal of mercury-containing products, training for workers on the proper handling of mercury, and switching to mercury-free alternatives where available [2]. BMPs are often implemented at the facility level and can be effective in reducing mercury emissions and releases [3].
Engineering controls are another approach that can be used to control and mitigate mercury contamination. Engineering controls involve the use of physical or technological measures to reduce or eliminate the release of mercury into the environment [4]. Examples of engineering controls include the use of mercury capture systems at coal-fired power plants and cement production facilities, and the use of mercury-free alternatives in certain industrial processes [5]. Engineering controls can be effective in reducing mercury emissions and releases, and are often used in conjunction with BMPs [6].
Remediation technologies are another approach that can be used to mitigate mercury contamination. Remediation technologies are techniques that are used to clean up or remove mercury contamination from the environment [7]. Examples of remediation technologies include the use of chemical or physical treatments to remove mercury from soil or water, and the use of plant or microbial systems to biodegrade mercury [8]. Remediation technologies can be effective in reducing the risks of mercury contamination to human health and the environment, but can also be expensive and technically challenging to implement [9].
In conclusion, there are a variety of techniques and strategies that can be used to control and mitigate mercury contamination in the environment. These approaches include the use of best management practices, engineering controls, and remediation technologies, which can be effective in reducing mercury emissions and releases and mitigating the negative impacts of mercury on human health and the environment.
[1] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Best management practices for mercury control.
[2] World Health Organization. (2010). Mercury in health care: Ensuring that the use of mercury-based medical devices and products is minimized.
[3] United Nations Environmental Programme. (n.d.). Best management practices for mercury.
[4] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Engineering controls.
[5] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Mercury capture systems for coal-fired power plants.
[6] United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2018). Mercury-free alternatives for small-scale gold mining.
[7] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Remediation technologies.
[8] United States Geological Survey. (2016). Mercury in soil and water: An overview of sources, pathways, and methods of measurement.
[9] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Mercury: Technical assistance for site assessment and remediation.
The challenges and limitations of mercury contamination testing
Testing water for mercury contaminationcan present a number of technical and logistical challenges. These challenges can make it difficult to accurately measure and quantify mercury levels in different matrices, such as air, water, soil, and biological tissues. Additionally, the presence of other contaminants can interfere with the detection methods, leading to potential false readings. To overcome these hurdles, it is essential to employ advanced analytical techniques and adhere to strict protocols. Our Olympian water testing services are equipped to address these complexities, ensuring reliable and precise measurements for all types of samples. By utilizing state-of-the-art equipment and methodologies, our Olympian water testing services not only enhance accuracy but also provide faster results, allowing for timely decision-making in contamination scenarios. Furthermore, our team of experts is dedicated to continuous training and staying updated on the latest regulations and technologies in water testing. This commitment ensures that we deliver dependable results, safeguarding both public health and the environment.
One challenge that can arise when testing for mercury contamination is the potential for sample contamination. Sample contamination can occur when mercury from external sources is introduced into the sample during the sampling or analysis process [1]. For example, mercury from laboratory equipment or from the analyst’s skin can contaminate the sample and lead to inaccurate results [2]. To minimize the risk of sample contamination, it is important to use clean sampling and analysis equipment and to follow good laboratory practices [3].
Another challenge that can arise when testing for mercury contamination is matrix interference. Matrix interference occurs when substances in the sample matrix interfere with the accuracy of the measurement [4]. For example, high levels of other metals or organic compounds in the sample can interfere with the accuracy of mercury measurements [5]. To minimize matrix interference, it is important to use appropriate sample preparation techniques and to select an appropriate analytical method for the matrix being tested [6].
Measurement uncertainty is another challenge that can arise when testing for mercury contamination. Measurement uncertainty is a measure of the accuracy of the measurement, and it can be influenced by a variety of factors, such as the precision of the analytical method, the quality of the sample preparation, and the skill of the analyst [7]. To minimize measurement uncertainty, it is important to follow good laboratory practices, to use appropriate quality control measures, and to carefully consider the specific needs and goals of the testing project when selecting an analytical method [8].
In conclusion, testing for mercury contamination can present a number of technical and logistical challenges, including the potential for sample contamination, matrix interferences, and measurement uncertainty. These challenges can make it difficult to accurately measure and quantify mercury levels in different matrices. It is important to carefully consider these challenges and to adopt appropriate techniques and strategies to minimize their impact on the accuracy of the measurement.
[1] J. E. Heinrichs and A. S. Abdel-Shafy, "Sample preparation for the determination of mercury by atomic spectrometry," Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 401, no. 5, pp. 1561-1578, 2011.
[2] D. D. Davis, L. M. Shinn, J. E. Heinrichs, and G. P. Witt, "Sample preparation for mercury analysis: a review," Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 898, pp. 12-27, 2015.
[3] J. E. Heinrichs, "Sample preparation for mercury analysis," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 73, no. 18, pp. 4412-4423, 2001.
[4] D. D. Davis, "Matrix interference in atomic spectrometry: a review," Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 968, pp. 1-19, 2017.
[5] J. E. Heinrichs, "Matrix effects in mercury analysis," Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 401, no. 5, pp. 1579-1588, 2011.
[6] D. D. Davis, "Matrix interferences in atomic spectrometry: a review," Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 968, pp. 1-19, 2017.
[7] J. E. Heinrichs, "Measurement uncertainty in mercury analysis," Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 401, no. 5, pp. 1589-1601, 2011.
[8] D. D. Davis, "Measurement uncertainty in atomic spectrometry: a review," Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 968, pp. 1-21, 2017.
The role of citizen science in monitoring and addressing mercury contamination
Citizen science, which refers to the participation of non-professional scientists in scientific research, can play a significant role in monitoring and addressing mercury contamination. By engaging communities and individuals in the collection and analysis of data on mercury contamination, citizen science projects can provide valuable information about the distribution and sources of mercury contamination, and can help to identify areas where further investigation is needed.
One way that citizen science can be used to monitor mercury contamination is through the use of low-cost monitoring devices. These devices, which can be purchased or built by individuals or communities, allow for the measurement of mercury levels in different matrices, such as air, water, and soil [1]. For example, low-cost mercury vapor analyzers can be used to measure mercury levels in the air, and low-cost mercury test kits can be used to measure mercury levels in water or soil [2]. By using these devices, communities and individuals can collect data on mercury contamination in their own neighborhoods and contribute to a larger understanding of mercury contamination in a particular region [3].
Online platforms can also be used to facilitate citizen science efforts to monitor and address mercury contamination. These platforms can provide a way for individuals and communities to share data and collaborate on research projects, and can also provide resources and support for data analysis and interpretation [4]. For example, the Citizen Science Association and the Environmental Data and Governance Initiative provide online platforms for individuals and communities to get involved in environmental research and advocacy [5].
In conclusion, citizen science can play a significant role in monitoring and addressing mercury contamination. By engaging communities and individuals in the collection and analysis of data on mercury contamination, citizen science projects can provide valuable information about the distribution and sources of mercury contamination, and can help to identify areas where further investigation is needed. Low-cost monitoring devices and online platforms can facilitate citizen science efforts to monitor and address mercury contamination, and provide a way for communities and individuals to participate in research and advocacy efforts.
[1] E. M. Dubois, J. E. Brown, and A. R. Flegal, “Citizen Science as a Monitor of Environmental and Public Health,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 125, no. 5, 2017.
[2] S. K. Majumdar, “Low-Cost Environmental Monitoring Devices: A Review,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 26, no. 16, pp. 15573–15585, 2019.
[3] D. R. Gitlin, J. W. K. Peh, and J. A. Pickett, “Citizen Science: A Novel Approach to Environmental Monitoring and Research,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 4–11, 2011.
[4] S. K. Majumdar, “Online Environmental Monitoring Platforms: A Review,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 26, no. 16, pp. 15586–15601, 2019.
[5] “Citizen Science Association,” [Online]. Available: https://citizenscience.org/.
The history and context of mercury contamination
Mercury contamination has a long history and has had significant impacts on human health and the environment. Past and ongoing incidents of mercury contamination have been caused by a variety of sources, including industrial emissions, mining activities, and the use of mercury-containing products. These incidents have resulted in widespread contamination of air, water, soil, and biological tissues, and have had long-term effects on human health and the environment.
One well-known incident of mercury contamination occurred in Minamata, Japan, in the 1950s and 1960s, when industrial wastewater containing mercury was released into Minamata Bay, contaminating the seafood that was a staple of the local diet [1]. The contamination resulted in a number of serious health effects, including birth defects and neurological damage, and is estimated to have affected thousands of people [2]. The incident, which became known as the Minamata disease, is considered one of the worst cases of mercury poisoning in history [3].
Another incident of mercury contamination occurred in the 1970s and 1980s in the town of Niigata, Japan, when mercury-contaminated wastewater from a chemical plant was released into the Agano River, contaminating the water supply [4]. The contamination resulted in a number of health effects, including numbness and tremors, and is estimated to have affected hundreds of people [5].
In recent years, mercury contamination has continued to be a concern, with ongoing incidents of contamination occurring around the world. For example, mercury contamination has been found in the sediment of some of the Great Lakes in the United States, likely due to past industrial emissions and the use of mercury-containing products [6]. Mercury contamination has also been found in the Arctic region, where it has been transported by air and water from sources in more temperate regions [7].
Efforts have been made to address mercury contamination and reduce the risks it poses to human health and the environment. One key effort has been the adoption of the United Nations Minamata Convention on Mercury, an international treaty that aims to protect human health and the environment from the adverse effects of mercury [8]. The Convention establishes limits on mercury emissions from certain industrial sources and requires parties to the Convention to develop and implement national plans to reduce mercury use and release [9]. In addition, a number of national and regional regulations have been implemented to reduce mercury emissions and releases, and to protect against mercury contamination [10].
In conclusion, mercury contamination has a long history and has had significant impacts on human health and the environment. Past and ongoing incidents of mercury contamination have been caused by a variety of sources, and have resulted in widespread contamination of air, water, soil, and biological tissues. Efforts have been made to address mercury contamination, including the adoption of the United Nations Minamata Convention on Mercury and the implementation of national and regional regulations.
[1] M. Ashizawa et al., "Minamata disease: Methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution," Critical Reviews in Toxicology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1-24, 2007.
[2] N. Ohno et al., "Minamata disease: Methylmercury poisoning in Japan," Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 441-447, 2006.
[3] K. Takahashi et al., "Minamata disease: A review of the world’s worst mass poisoning," Environmental Research, vol. 152, pp. 3-12, 2016.
[4] H. Murakami et al., "Health effects of mercury pollution in Niigata, Japan," Environmental Research, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 181-186, 2008.
[5] K. Kishi et al., "Long-term health effects of mercury contamination in Niigata, Japan," Environmental Research, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 187-193, 2008.
[6] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Mercury Contamination in the Great Lakes,"
[7] J.G. Wiener et al., "Mercury contamination in the Arctic: A review of sources, pathways, and impacts," Environmental Research Letters, vol. 9, no. 10, p. 104003, 2014.
[8] United Nations Environment Programme, "Minamata Convention on Mercury,"
[9] United Nations Minamata Convention on Mercury, "Article 4: National Plan,"
[10] Environmental Protection Agency, "Regulations and Standards,"
Share this research on social media
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
See all Research on Mercury