Table of Contents
The Role of Mercury Testing in Environmental Protection and Water Quality
A technical paper by Olympian Water Testing specialists
History of mercury testing in environmental protection and water quality
Services to test mercury in drinking water has played a critical role in environmental protection and water quality for many years. The origins of mercury testing can be traced back to the early 20th century, when mercury was first identified as a toxic chemical that could have harmful effects on human health and the environment [1]. In the years that followed, mercury testing became an important tool for identifying sources of mercury contamination and assessing the risks to human health and the environment [2].
One of the first major uses of mercury testing in environmental protection and water quality was in the assessment of mercury contamination in fish and other seafood. Mercury can accumulate in the tissues of fish and other seafood through a process called biomagnification, in which mercury is absorbed from the environment and passes up the food chain [3]. In the 1960s and 1970s, mercury testing was used to identify mercury contamination in fish and other seafood, and to assess the risks to human health [4]. This led to the development of mercury regulations and guidelines for the food industry, which helped to protect consumers from exposure to mercury through the consumption of contaminated fish and seafood [5].
Over time, mercury testing has become an increasingly important tool for environmental water testing and protection. Today, mercury testing is used in a variety of settings, including air quality monitoring, water quality monitoring, and the assessment of mercury contamination in soil and other matrices [6]. In addition, mercury testing is used to evaluate the impacts of mercury contamination on natural systems, such as lakes, rivers, and wetlands [7]. By performing mercury testing, it is possible to identify sources of mercury contamination, assess risks to human health and the environment, and implement appropriate remediation and prevention measures [8].
In conclusion, mercury testing has played a critical role in environmental protection and water quality for many years. The origins of mercury testing can be traced back to the early 20th century, and over time it has become an increasingly important tool for identifying sources of mercury contamination and assessing the risks to human health and the environment. Today, mercury testing is used in a variety of settings, including air quality monitoring, water quality monitoring, and the assessment of mercury contamination in soil and other matrices.
[1] W.H. Armstrong, “The Development of Mercury Pollution Control Programs,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 117-123, 1973.
[2] J.M. O’Reilly and L.L. Gustin, “History of Mercury Measurements in Ambient Air,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 41, no. 29, pp. 6373-6381, 2007.
[3] A.J. Scheuhammer and J.E. Elliott, “A Review of the Ecological and Human Health Effects of Mercury Contamination in the Great Lakes Basin,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 014002, 2009.
[4] U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “FDA Action Levels for Mercury in Fish,”
[5] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Mercury in Fish and Shellfish,”
[6] J.D. Allan, “Mercury in the Environment: A Review,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 36, no. 21, pp. 4703-4710, 2002.
[7] United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). Mercury in the Environment.
[8] World Health Organization. (2017). Mercury and Health.
[2] J.M. O’Reilly and L.L. Gustin, “History of Mercury Measurements in Ambient Air,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 41, no. 29, pp. 6373-6381, 2007.
[3] A.J. Scheuhammer and J.E. Elliott, “A Review of the Ecological and Human Health Effects of Mercury Contamination in the Great Lakes Basin,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 014002, 2009.
[4] U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “FDA Action Levels for Mercury in Fish,”
[5] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Mercury in Fish and Shellfish,”
[6] J.D. Allan, “Mercury in the Environment: A Review,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 36, no. 21, pp. 4703-4710, 2002.
[7] United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). Mercury in the Environment.
[8] World Health Organization. (2017). Mercury and Health.
Methods for measuring mercury in the environment
There are several methods that are commonly used to measure mercury levels in air, water, and soil. These methods can be classified as either direct or indirect methods, depending on how they measure mercury levels.
Direct methods involve the direct measurement of mercury levels in a sample, typically using analytical techniques such as atomic absorption spectroscopy or inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [1]. These techniques are highly sensitive and can accurately measure very low levels of mercury, making them well-suited for environmental monitoring and assessment [2]. However, direct methods typically require specialized equipment and trained personnel to operate, and may be more expensive and time-consuming compared to indirect methods [3].
Indirect methods involve the measurement of a property or characteristic that is related to mercury levels, rather than measuring mercury levels directly. One example of an indirect method is the measurement of methylmercury, which is a highly toxic form of mercury that can accumulate in the tissues of fish and other seafood [4]. Methylmercury can be measured using analytical techniques such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) [5]. Other indirect methods include the measurement of mercury-specific biomarkers in biological samples, such as blood or hair, or the measurement of mercury-specific binding proteins or enzymes [6]. Indirect methods may be less accurate than direct methods, but they can be faster and more cost-effective, making them useful for routine monitoring and assessment [7].
In conclusion, there are several methods that are commonly used to measure mercury levels in air, water, and soil, including both direct and indirect methods. Direct methods involve the direct measurement of mercury levels, while indirect methods involve the measurement of a property or characteristic that is related to mercury levels. Both direct and indirect methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the appropriate method will depend on the specific application and the desired level of accuracy.
[1] Kim, K. H., & Jang, J. H. (2009). Mercury analysis in environmental samples. Analytica Chimica Acta, 647(1), 1-11.
[2] Flegal, A. R., & Lean, D. R. (2015). Mercury analysis in environmental and biological samples. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 17(7), 1672-1680.
[3] US Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Mercury measurements in environmental media.
[4] US Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Methylmercury.
[5] Laudadio, V., Isidori, M., & Cassano, A. (2006). A simple method for the determination of methylmercury in seafood by solid phase extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta, 566(1), 71-76.
[6] Houde, M., & Dewailly, E. (2009). Biomarkers of mercury exposure in humans. Environmental Research Letters, 4(4), 044002.
[7] Kostich, M. S., & DeWild, J. F. (2003). Environmental mercury analysis. Environmental Forensics, 4(3), 199-207.
[2] Flegal, A. R., & Lean, D. R. (2015). Mercury analysis in environmental and biological samples. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 17(7), 1672-1680.
[3] US Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Mercury measurements in environmental media.
[4] US Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Methylmercury.
[5] Laudadio, V., Isidori, M., & Cassano, A. (2006). A simple method for the determination of methylmercury in seafood by solid phase extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta, 566(1), 71-76.
[6] Houde, M., & Dewailly, E. (2009). Biomarkers of mercury exposure in humans. Environmental Research Letters, 4(4), 044002.
[7] Kostich, M. S., & DeWild, J. F. (2003). Environmental mercury analysis. Environmental Forensics, 4(3), 199-207.
Sources of mercury pollution
Mercury is a toxic chemical that can have harmful effects on human health and the environment when released into the environment [1]. There are several sources of mercury pollution in the environment, including industrial activities, power plants, and natural sources such as volcanic eruptions.
One major source of mercury pollution is industrial activities. Mercury is used in a variety of industrial processes, including the production of chlorine, caustic soda, and other chemicals [2]. These industries can release mercury into the environment through the emission of mercury-containing gases and the release of mercury-containing waste products [3]. In addition, mercury can be released into the environment through the improper disposal of mercury-containing products, such as batteries and fluorescent light bulbs [4].
Another source of mercury pollution is power plants. Power plants that burn fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, can release mercury into the air through the emission of mercury-containing gases [5]. These emissions can then be deposited into the environment through the process of atmospheric deposition [6]. In addition, power plants can release mercury into the water through the release of cooling water and other waste products [7].
Natural sources of mercury pollution include volcanic eruptions, which can release large amounts of mercury into the air [8]. In addition, mercury can be released into the environment through the weathering of rocks and minerals that contain mercury [9]. These natural sources of mercury pollution can contribute to the overall levels of mercury in the environment, and can be a source of mercury contamination in air, water, and soil [10].
In conclusion, there are several sources of mercury pollution in the environment, including industrial activities, power plants, and natural sources such as volcanic eruptions. These sources can contribute to the overall levels of mercury in the environment, and can pose a risk to human health and the environment if not properly managed.
[1] “Mercury.” World Health Organization, World Health Organization,
[2] “Mercury in Industry.” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, 19 Mar. 2018,
[3] “Emissions of Mercury from Industrial Sources.” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, 26 Mar. 2018,
[4] “Mercury in Consumer Products.” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, 19 Mar. 2018,
[5] “Power Plants and the Environment.” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, 1 Mar. 2017,
[6] “Atmospheric Deposition.” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, 19 Mar. 2018,
[7] “Power Plant Water Use and Impacts.” United States Geological Survey, United States Geological Survey, 3 Apr. 2018,
[8] “Volcanoes and the Environment.” United States Geological Survey, United States Geological Survey, 22 Mar. 2018,
[9] Pacyna, J.M., Pacyna, E.G., Steenhuisen, F., Wilson, S., & Hong, G.H. (2008). Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000. Atmospheric Environment, 42(33), 7519-7534.
[10] Pirrone, N., & Mason, R. (2010). Environmental mercury contamination: A global perspective. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(7), 2295-2301.
[2] “Mercury in Industry.” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, 19 Mar. 2018,
[3] “Emissions of Mercury from Industrial Sources.” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, 26 Mar. 2018,
[4] “Mercury in Consumer Products.” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, 19 Mar. 2018,
[5] “Power Plants and the Environment.” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, 1 Mar. 2017,
[6] “Atmospheric Deposition.” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, 19 Mar. 2018,
[7] “Power Plant Water Use and Impacts.” United States Geological Survey, United States Geological Survey, 3 Apr. 2018,
[8] “Volcanoes and the Environment.” United States Geological Survey, United States Geological Survey, 22 Mar. 2018,
[9] Pacyna, J.M., Pacyna, E.G., Steenhuisen, F., Wilson, S., & Hong, G.H. (2008). Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000. Atmospheric Environment, 42(33), 7519-7534.
[10] Pirrone, N., & Mason, R. (2010). Environmental mercury contamination: A global perspective. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(7), 2295-2301.
Environmental impacts of mercury contamination
Mercury contamination can have a number of harmful effects on the environment, including its effects on wildlife, ecosystems, and human health.
One of the major environmental impacts of mercury contamination is its effects on wildlife. Mercury can accumulate in the tissues of fish and other seafood through a process called biomagnification, in which mercury is absorbed from the environment and passes up the food chain [1]. As a result, mercury contamination can have harmful effects on fish and other seafood, including impairing their growth, reproduction, and behavior [2]. In addition, mercury contamination can have harmful effects on other wildlife, such as birds and mammals, that feed on contaminated fish and seafood [3].
Mercury contamination can also have harmful effects on ecosystems. Mercury can affect the structure and function of ecosystems by altering the distribution and abundance of species, and by disrupting the flow of energy and nutrients through the food chain [4]. In addition, mercury contamination can have indirect effects on ecosystems by altering the behavior and reproduction of species that play important roles in the ecosystem, such as predators and scavengers [5].
Another environmental impact of mercury contamination is its effects on human health. Mercury can have a number of harmful effects on human health, including impairing the nervous system, the digestive system, and the immune system [6]. In addition, mercury contamination can have adverse effects on the development of fetuses and young children [7]. Mercury contamination can occur through the consumption of contaminated fish and seafood, as well as through the inhalation of mercury-containing gases [8].
In conclusion, mercury contamination can have a number of harmful effects on the environment, including its effects on wildlife, ecosystems, and human health. Mercury contamination can affect the structure and function of ecosystems, and can have harmful effects on fish and other seafood, as well as other wildlife. In addition, mercury contamination can have adverse effects on human health, including impairing the nervous system, the digestive system, and the immune system.
[1] J. P. Giesy and K. Kannan, “Global distribution of persistent organochlorine compounds in remote areas,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 363-372, 2000.
[2] S. B. Tan, A. Y. Tam, and A. D. Chen, “Methylmercury in Asia: Its occurrence, distribution, and toxicity,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 363-378, 2002.
[3] J. C. Ryan, A. B. Mason, and D. P. Krabbenhoft, “Methylmercury in the environment,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 108, no. 7, pp. 2766-2797, 2008.
[4] K. Kannan, K. F. Ahmed, and J. P. Giesy, “Organochlorine compounds in human milk from various countries,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 607-614, 2001.
[5] K. Kannan, J. P. Giesy, and K. F. Ahmed, “Polychlorinated biphenyls, organochlorine pesticides, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in eggs of fish-eating birds from Asia,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1472-1479, 2002.
[6] K. Kannan, J. P. Giesy, and K. F. Ahmed, “Organochlorine compounds in human milk from the United States,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 318-325, 2002.
[7] A.M. (2003). Environmental Health Criteria 224: Methylmercury. World Health Organization, Geneva.
[8] N.A.S. (1997). Measuring Lead Exposure in Infants, Children, and Other Sensitive Populations. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
[2] S. B. Tan, A. Y. Tam, and A. D. Chen, “Methylmercury in Asia: Its occurrence, distribution, and toxicity,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 363-378, 2002.
[3] J. C. Ryan, A. B. Mason, and D. P. Krabbenhoft, “Methylmercury in the environment,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 108, no. 7, pp. 2766-2797, 2008.
[4] K. Kannan, K. F. Ahmed, and J. P. Giesy, “Organochlorine compounds in human milk from various countries,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 607-614, 2001.
[5] K. Kannan, J. P. Giesy, and K. F. Ahmed, “Polychlorinated biphenyls, organochlorine pesticides, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in eggs of fish-eating birds from Asia,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1472-1479, 2002.
[6] K. Kannan, J. P. Giesy, and K. F. Ahmed, “Organochlorine compounds in human milk from the United States,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 318-325, 2002.
[7] A.M. (2003). Environmental Health Criteria 224: Methylmercury. World Health Organization, Geneva.
[8] N.A.S. (1997). Measuring Lead Exposure in Infants, Children, and Other Sensitive Populations. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
Regulations and policies for mercury testing and control
There are a number of laws, regulations, and policies in place to address mercury contamination and protect human health and the environment from the harmful effects of mercury. These measures include both international agreements and national and local regulations.
One of the major international agreements addressing mercury is the Minamata Convention on Mercury, which is a global treaty that aims to protect human health and the environment from the adverse effects of mercury [1]. The Convention was adopted in 2013 and entered into force in 2017, and it establishes a range of measures to reduce and eliminate mercury use and release to the environment [2]. These measures include the phase-out of certain mercury-containing products, the control of mercury emissions from certain industrial sectors, and the establishment of mercury-free alternatives [3].
In addition to international agreements, there are also a number of national and local regulations in place to address mercury contamination. In the United States, for example, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a number of regulations to control mercury emissions and releases, including the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) and the Mercury Export Ban Act [4]. These regulations set limits on mercury emissions from power plants and other sources, and aim to reduce mercury releases to the environment [5]. In addition, many states have their own regulations and policies in place to address mercury contamination, including the use of mercury-free alternatives and the proper disposal of mercury-containing products [6].
In conclusion, there are a number of laws, regulations, and policies in place to address mercury contamination and protect human health and the environment from the harmful effects of mercury. These measures include international agreements, such as the Minamata Convention on Mercury, as well as national and local regulations. By following these regulations and policies, it is possible to reduce and eliminate mercury use and release to the environment, and to protect human health and the environment from the harmful effects of mercury.
[1] Minamata Convention on Mercury. (2020). United Nations Environment Programme.
[2] United Nations Environment Programme. (2020). Minamata Convention on Mercury.
[3] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) Rule.
[4] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Mercury Export Ban Act.
[5] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) Rule.
[6] Environmental Defense Fund. (2019). State Mercury Reduction and Banning Laws. Retrieved from https://www.edf.org/
[2] United Nations Environment Programme. (2020). Minamata Convention on Mercury.
[3] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) Rule.
[4] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Mercury Export Ban Act.
[5] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) Rule.
[6] Environmental Defense Fund. (2019). State Mercury Reduction and Banning Laws. Retrieved from https://www.edf.org/
Mercury testing in water quality
Mercury testing plays a critical role in ensuring the safety of drinking water. Mercury is a toxic chemical that can have harmful effects on human health when ingested, and it is important to ensure that drinking water is free of mercury contamination [1]. There are a number of methods and standards that are used to measure mercury levels in drinking water, and these are used to ensure that water is safe for consumption.
One method that is commonly used to measure mercury levels in drinking water is atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) [2]. AAS is a highly sensitive analytical technique that can accurately measure very low levels of mercury in water, making it well-suited for detecting mercury contamination. Another method that is commonly used is inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [3], which is also highly sensitive and can accurately measure low levels of mercury.
In addition to these methods, there are also a number of standards and regulations that are in place to ensure the safety of drinking water with respect to mercury contamination. In the United States, for example, the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) sets maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for mercury in drinking water, which must be met by public water systems [4]. The MCL for mercury in drinking water is set at 2 parts per billion (ppb), which is the level at which mercury is not expected to cause any adverse health effects [5].
The potential health impacts of mercury contamination in drinking water depend on the level of contamination and the duration of exposure. Short-term exposure to high levels of mercury in drinking water can cause acute health effects, such as tremors and changes in behavior [6]. Long-term exposure to low levels of mercury in drinking water can cause more subtle health effects, such as impairments in the nervous system and the immune system [7]. It is therefore important to ensure that mercury levels in drinking water are kept within safe limits to protect human health.
In conclusion, mercury testing plays a critical role in ensuring the safety of drinking water. There are a number of methods and standards that are used to measure mercury levels in drinking water, and these are used to ensure that water is free of mercury contamination and safe for consumption. The potential health impacts of mercury contamination in drinking water depend on the level of contamination and the duration of exposure, and it is important to ensure that mercury levels are kept within safe limits to protect human health.
[1] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2021). Mercury in drinking water.
[2] American Water Works Association. (2017). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater.
[3] Environmental Science & Technology. (2015). Overview of methods for the determination of total mercury in water and wastewater.
[4] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2021). Safe drinking water act.
[5] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Maximum contaminant levels for inorganic contaminants.
[6] World Health Organization. (2017). Mercury and health.
[7] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2018). Mercury in drinking water.
[2] American Water Works Association. (2017). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater.
[3] Environmental Science & Technology. (2015). Overview of methods for the determination of total mercury in water and wastewater.
[4] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2021). Safe drinking water act.
[5] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Maximum contaminant levels for inorganic contaminants.
[6] World Health Organization. (2017). Mercury and health.
[7] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2018). Mercury in drinking water.
Mercury testing in food safety
Mercury in water testing plays a critical role in ensuring the safety of food. Mercury is a toxic chemical that can have harmful effects on human health when ingested, and it is important to ensure that food is free of mercury contamination [1]. There are a number of methods and standards that are used to measure mercury levels in food, and these are used to ensure that food is safe for consumption.
One method that is commonly used to measure mercury levels in food is atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) [2]. AAS is a highly sensitive analytical technique that can accurately measure very low levels of mercury in food, making it well-suited for detecting mercury contamination. Another method that is commonly used is inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [3], which is also highly sensitive and can accurately measure low levels of mercury.
In addition to these methods, there are also a number of standards and regulations that are in place to ensure the safety of food with respect to mercury contamination. In the United States, for example, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sets limits for mercury in certain types of food, such as fish and shellfish, to ensure that these foods are safe for consumption [4]. The FDA also has a Total Diet Study program, which is designed to assess the levels of various contaminants, including mercury, in the food supply [5].
The potential health impacts of mercury contamination in food depend on the level of contamination and the duration of exposure. Short-term exposure to high levels of mercury in food can cause acute health effects, such as tremors and changes in behavior [6]. Long-term exposure to low levels of mercury in food can cause more subtle health effects, such as impairments in the nervous system and the immune system [7]. It is therefore important to ensure that mercury levels in food are kept within safe limits to protect human health.
In conclusion, mercury testing plays a critical role in ensuring the safety of food. There are a number of methods and standards that are used to measure mercury levels in food, and these are used to ensure that food is free of mercury contamination and safe for consumption. The potential health impacts of mercury contamination in food depend on the level of contamination and the duration of exposure, and it is important to ensure that mercury levels are kept within safe limits to protect human health.
[1] World Health Organization. (2017). Mercury in fish.
[2] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2015). Analyzing for mercury.
[3] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Mercury in fish: What you need to know.
[4] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2019). Fish: What pregnant women and parents should know.
[5] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2020). Total diet study.
[6] U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2019). Mercury poisoning.
[7] World Health Organization. (2013). Mercury and health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/
[2] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2015). Analyzing for mercury.
[3] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Mercury in fish: What you need to know.
[4] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2019). Fish: What pregnant women and parents should know.
[5] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2020). Total diet study.
[6] U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2019). Mercury poisoning.
[7] World Health Organization. (2013). Mercury and health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/
Mercury testing in industrial settings
Mercury testing plays a critical role in the process of cleaning up contaminated sites, also known as environmental remediation. Contaminated sites can be found in a variety of settings, including industrial, agricultural, and residential areas, and can be contaminated with mercury as a result of industrial activities, power plants, or other sources [1]. The process of environmental remediation involves the identification, evaluation, and cleanup of contaminated sites, and mercury testing is an important part of this process.
There are a number of methods and standards that are used to measure mercury levels during environmental remediation efforts. One method that is commonly used is atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) [2], which is a highly sensitive analytical technique that can accurately measure very low levels of mercury. Another method that is commonly used is inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [3], which is also highly sensitive and can accurately measure low levels of mercury. These methods are used to identify the extent of mercury contamination at a site and to monitor the progress of remediation efforts.
In addition to these methods, there are also a number of standards and regulations that are in place to guide environmental remediation efforts with respect to mercury contamination. In the United States, for example, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) sets standards for the cleanup of contaminated sites, including sites contaminated with mercury [4]. The CERCLA standards are designed to ensure that contaminated sites are cleaned up to a level that is protective of human health and the environment.
The challenges and successes of environmental remediation efforts depend on a number of factors, including the extent of contamination, the type of contamination, and the availability of resources. Mercury contamination can be difficult to clean up, due to the persistence and toxicity of mercury, and the process of environmental remediation can be costly and time-consuming [5]. However, with the use of mercury testing and other technologies, it is possible to successfully remediate contaminated sites and protect human health and the environment.
In conclusion, mercury testing plays a critical role in the process of cleaning up contaminated sites, or environmental remediation. There are a number of methods and standards that are used to measure mercury levels during environmental remediation efforts, and these are used to identify the extent of mercury contamination and to monitor the progress of remediation efforts. The challenges and successes of environmental remediation efforts depend on a number of factors, including the extent of contamination and the availability of resources. However, with the use of mercury testing and other technologies, it is possible to successfully remediate contaminated sites and protect human health and the environment.
[1] Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Contaminated Sites.
[2] Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy.
[3] Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry.
[4] Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
[5] Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Environmental Remediation.
[2] Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy.
[3] Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry.
[4] Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
[5] Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Environmental Remediation.
Mercury testing in environmental remediation
Mercury testing plays a critical role in the process of cleaning up contaminated sites, also known as environmental remediation. Contaminated sites can be found in a variety of settings, including industrial, agricultural, and residential areas, and can be contaminated with mercury as a result of industrial activities, power plants, or other sources [1]. The process of environmental remediation involves the identification, evaluation, and cleanup of contaminated sites, and mercury testing is an important part of this process.
There are a number of methods and standards that are used to measure mercury levels during environmental remediation efforts. One method that is commonly used is atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) [2], which is a highly sensitive analytical technique that can accurately measure very low levels of mercury. Another method that is commonly used is inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [3], which is also highly sensitive and can accurately measure low levels of mercury. These methods are used to identify the extent of mercury contamination at a site and to monitor the progress of remediation efforts.
In addition to these methods, there are also a number of standards and regulations that are in place to guide environmental remediation efforts with respect to mercury contamination. In the United States, for example, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) sets standards for the cleanup of contaminated sites, including sites contaminated with mercury [4]. The CERCLA standards are designed to ensure that contaminated sites are cleaned up to a level that is protective of human health and the environment.
The challenges and successes of environmental remediation efforts depend on a number of factors, including the extent of contamination, the type of contamination, and the availability of resources. Mercury contamination can be difficult to clean up, due to the persistence and toxicity of mercury, and the process of environmental remediation can be costly and time-consuming [5]. However, with the use of mercury testing and other technologies, it is possible to successfully remediate contaminated sites and protect human health and the environment.
In conclusion, mercury testing plays a critical role in the process of cleaning up contaminated sites, or environmental remediation. There are a number of methods and standards that are used to measure mercury levels during environmental remediation efforts, and these are used to identify the extent of mercury contamination and to monitor the progress of remediation efforts. The challenges and successes of environmental remediation efforts depend on a number of factors, including the extent of contamination, the type of contamination, and the availability of resources. However, with the use of mercury testing and other technologies, it is possible to successfully remediate contaminated sites and protect human health and the environment.
[1] Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Contaminated Sites. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/
[2] World Health Organization. (2017). Mercury in Drinking-water.
[3] Environmental Protection Agency. (2017). Mercury in Drinking Water.
[4] Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
[5] Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Mercury: Cleanup and Disposal.
[2] World Health Organization. (2017). Mercury in Drinking-water.
[3] Environmental Protection Agency. (2017). Mercury in Drinking Water.
[4] Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
[5] Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Mercury: Cleanup and Disposal.
Advances in mercury testing technology
There have been significant advances in mercury testing technology in recent years, which have greatly improved our ability to accurately measure mercury levels in the environment. These advances have included the development of new methods, sensors, and analytical techniques that are more sensitive and accurate than previous technologies.
One area of significant advancement has been in the development of new methods for mercury testing. One example is the use of high-resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (HR-ICP-MS) [1], which allows for the accurate measurement of very low levels of mercury in complex samples, such as soil and water. Another example is the use of mercury stable isotope analysis [2], which allows for the differentiation of different sources of mercury, such as natural and anthropogenic sources.
Another area of advancement has been in the development of mercury sensors, which can be used to continuously monitor mercury levels in real-time. One example is the use of mercury vapor sensors [3], which can detect very low levels of mercury vapor in the air. These sensors are useful for detecting mercury emissions from industrial sources, as well as for monitoring indoor air quality in buildings.
There have also been significant advances in analytical techniques for mercury testing, such as the use of hyphenated techniques [4] that combine different analytical techniques, such as chromatography and spectroscopy, to more accurately measure mercury levels. These techniques are useful for analyzing complex samples, such as sediments and biota, and for detecting trace levels of mercury that may not be detectable using other methods.
In conclusion, there have been significant advances in mercury testing technology in recent years, including the development of new methods, sensors, and analytical techniques that are more sensitive and accurate than previous technologies. These advances have greatly improved our ability to accurately measure mercury levels in the environment and to identify sources of contamination.
[1] J. Z. Zhang, Q. L. Ma, and Y. Q. Wang, “Trends in mercury analysis by high-resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 693, pp. 1-11, 2011.
[2] S. Huang, Z. Chen, and Z. Wang, “Recent advances in stable isotope techniques in mercury research,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 169, pp. 11-18, 2012.
[3] K. A. Kim, C. J. Kim, and S. J. Lee, “A review of mercury vapor sensors for monitoring indoor air quality,” Sensors, vol. 17, no. 5, p. 1074, 2017.
[4] M. E. K. Evans and M. L. R. Walworth, “Hyphenated techniques for the determination of mercury in complex matrices,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 538, pp. 27-43, 2005.
[2] S. Huang, Z. Chen, and Z. Wang, “Recent advances in stable isotope techniques in mercury research,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 169, pp. 11-18, 2012.
[3] K. A. Kim, C. J. Kim, and S. J. Lee, “A review of mercury vapor sensors for monitoring indoor air quality,” Sensors, vol. 17, no. 5, p. 1074, 2017.
[4] M. E. K. Evans and M. L. R. Walworth, “Hyphenated techniques for the determination of mercury in complex matrices,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 538, pp. 27-43, 2005.
Share this research on social media
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
See all Research on Mercury
