Table of Contents
Understanding the Different Types of Uranium Contaminants and Their Testing Methods
A technical paper by Olympian Water Testing specialists
Introduction to uranium and its properties
Uranium is a chemical element that exists naturally, but in small amounts in Earth’s crust [1]. It is a thick, dense metal that’s silvery-white in appearance and metallic [2]. Uranium is radioactive and has various isotopes, the most abundant is uranium-238 (U-238) and unstable uranium-235 (U-235) used in nuclear energy and in the manufacture of nuclear weapons [3].
Uranium is different in several physical and chemical properties that are related to use and effects on the environment. Uranium is a dense solid metal in its pure form, and it is 1,132 °C at room temperature [4]. Uranium is also high in atomic number and low in vapor pressure, so it cannot easily evaporate or be converted into a gas [5].
Uranium was once employed as a source of heat and power, a colourant in ceramics and glass, and as a radiation source in cancer treatment [6]. But the biggest application for uranium is in nuclear power reactors [7]. Uranium can also be the target of illegal or bad intent activities like making nuclear weapons [8].
Uranium is a naturally occurring chemical element with several physical and chemical attributes of interest in its use and potential environmental effects. The biggest application is in nuclear power reactors. But its potential for the manufacture of nuclear weapons and other forms of evil make knowing and treating uranium and its contaminants imperative.
[1] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2018). Uranium: Properties, occurrence and uses.
[2] US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2021). Uranium.
[3] United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2019). Uranium in drinking water.
[4] National Nuclear Data Center (NNDC). (n.d.). U-238 properties.
[5] European Commission (EC). (2017). Uranium in the environment: Properties and behaviour.
[6] World Nuclear Association (WNA). (n.d.). Uranium: Its uses and hazards.
[7] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2020). The role of nuclear power in the world energy mix.
[8] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2019). The nuclear fuel cycle. Retrieved from https://www-pub.iaea.org/
Types of uranium contaminants
Uranium is a chemical element that exists in trace quantities in Earth’s crust [1]. It comes in different varieties, isotopes, whose nucleus contains more or fewer neutrons. Nature’s isotope most frequently used for uranium is uranium-238 (U-228), representing more than 99.9% of natural uranium. But there are also other uranium isotopes that are present in trace quantities and are called uranium contaminants.
Among them is uranium-234 (U-234) [2]. This isotope is the decay product of U-238 and it is found in trace amounts in natural uranium. U-234 is radioactive, too – its half-life is roughly 245,000 years. But its specific activity is a lot less than that of U-238, and it plays little part in the overall radioactivity of natural uranium.
Another uranium contaminant is uranium-235 (U-235), the isotope in nuclear power and nuclear weapons. U-235 is only approximately 0.7% of natural uranium [3], but due to its fissionability it’s a valuable fuel for nuclear power reactors and the exploding material in nuclear weapons. But given its potential for nuclear weaponisation, this isotope is extremely sensitive to detection and tracking.
The second is a decay product of U-238, Uranium-232, half-lives around 68.9 years, less radioactive than U-238. But it also has a very long decay series, so that it emits a bunch of other radioactive isotopes over a long period of decay. Also it emits high-energy gamma rays that are a health risk if inhaled.
In natural uranium, there are different kinds of uranium contaminants. We need to know the properties of these contaminants, and how they are different from one another, if we want to treat and manage uranium correctly, or detect and track the development of nuclear weapons.
[1] International Atomic Energy Agency. (n.d.). Uranium and Its Uses.
[2] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Uranium.
[3] Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (n.d.). Uranium and Its Uses.
Sources of uranium contamination
Uranium contamination can be from mining and processing, from nuclear reactors and in the environment, from soil and water.
Mining and processing are among the main sources of uranium contamination [1]. Uranium is mainly extracted from other metals like copper, gold and silver. While digging, lots of rock and soil get eroded, and uranium and other radioactive substances are released into the air. Also, uranium ore processing will release pollutants into the air and water and can also be the waste of which contains high amounts of uranium [2].
Nuclear power plants are another large uranium source [3]. Atomic power stations make electricity from the energy released when uranium-235 atoms split. It generates lots of radioactive waste, including spent fuel rods which can be extremely radioactive. Moreover, in ordinary nuclear power stations, very small quantities of radioactive material can be discharged into the air and water, contaminating the area.
Even uranium contamination from soil and water can be natural [4]. Uranium exists in trace amounts in Earth’s crust, and it leaches into drinking water from underground deposits of uranium. It also erodes, weathers and other natural processes to contaminate land and water. Then there are the volcanic eruptions and earthquakes that bring uranium deposits to the surface and transport them into water or space.
We can get uranium contamination from a variety of sources: mines and processing facilities, nuclear reactors, soil and water. Knowing these sources will allow you to predict where contamination will occur and how to manage and remediate it.
[1] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2021). Uranium mining in the 21st century.
[2] World Nuclear Association. (2021). Uranium mining and milling.
[3] International Atomic Energy Agency. (2021). Nuclear power in the world today.
[4] United States Geological Survey. (2021). Uranium in the environment. Retrieved from https://www.usgs.gov/
Health effects of uranium contamination
Radiation exposure to uranium and its contaminants can have different health impacts depending on the type of exposure and the extent of contamination. General health risks from uranium pollution are cancer and other ailments.
A major health issue with the contamination of uranium was cancer. Evidence indicates that exposure to high concentrations of uranium and its elements could lead to lung and other cancers [1]. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has labelled uranium as a Group 1 carcinogen, that is to say, a carcinogen in humans [2].
Other health risks of exposure to uranium contaminants go beyond cancer. We can also inhale uranium dust or fumes and get irritated lung with coughing, wheezing, and shortness of breath [3]. Consuming uranium-contaminated water or food also leads to nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea [4]. Long-term exposure to uranium contaminants can damage kidneys too [5].
As it is worth noting, the amount and type of uranium, the amount of contaminated material, and exposure time are not the same for uranium. For instance, it is less toxic to the environment to be exposed to insoluble uranium compounds (in natural ores, for instance) than to soluble uranium compounds (in ores being processed or in the waste streams).
Contaminants in uranium can cause a wide range of health problems, but the major issue is cancer. Knowing the health risks of uranium contamination and trying to limit exposure are all things to consider. Moreover, exposure levels and management policies are also important to human health.
[1] US Environmental Protection Agency. (2017). Health Effects of Uranium.
[2] International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2012). Uranium and Uranium Mining.
[3] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). Uranium.
[4] World Health Organization. (2017). Uranium in Drinking Water.
[5] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation.
Testing methods for uranium contamination
Test methods that can be applied to the matrices of water, air, soil, and living material to detect and quantify uranium contamination. They are chemical analyses, radiometric measurements and physical measurements.
Chemical testing is done by using chemicals and reagents to extract and detect the amount of uranium in a water sample. For instance, uranium in soil and water can be recovered using a reagent like ammonium diuranate (NH4)2U2O7, and determined by methods like ICP-MS [1]. Another popular technique is ion-exchange resin which will efficiently separate and concentrate the uranium ions, and then an ICP-MS or an alpha spectrometry measurement.
The level of uranium in the sample can also be detected using radiometric methods (gamma spectrometry, etc.) [2]. Gamma spectrometry relies on measuring gamma radiation produced by the sample, and it’s a powerful tool to identify and quantify uranium in samples (in the environment) or in ores that have been treated.
We can also detect and count uranium contents in a sample with physical measurements like alpha spectrometry [3]. Alpha spectrometry uses the count of the alpha particles released by an object, and it can identify very minute traces of uranium.
It is possible to test uranium contamination in different materials with different test procedures. Chemical analysis, radiometric analysis, physical measurements are all standard procedures and, depending on the objectives and limitations of a research project, one or several methods can be combined to yield precise and accurate data.
[1] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). Methods for the determination of inorganic substances in environmental samples.
[2] International Atomic Energy Agency. (2015). Gamma spectrometry in the analysis of environmental samples. Retrieved from https://www-pub.iaea.org/
[3] European Commission Joint Research Centre. (2012). Alpha spectrometry for the determination of radionuclides in environmental samples.
Remediation of uranium contamination
Uranium contamination remediation – A term that refers to any of the techniques employed to disinfect and restore uranium contaminated sites. It will depend on the contamination, where the contamination is and available resources on what remediation process to use.
Physical extraction of the contaminated material is a common technique of uranium remediation. This can mean digging up contaminated earth or dragging contaminated mud from a reservoir. All the sucked-up contents are eventually released into a licensed, protected dump [1].
There’s also chemical treatment to lock the uranium in place. This can be by a chemical such as phosphate, which can react to create a solid or insoluble product of the uranium and this would be harder to carry around and more resistant to re-entry into plants or animals [2]. Chelating to remove the dissolved uranium from water sources was also touted as a good solution to uranium removal [3].
There is also bioremediation, in which contaminants are dissolved by microorganisms. This can be done by adding the presence of certain microorganisms that can digest and remove the contaminants from the environment [4]. This technique has been proven to be effective in uranium contaminated soils.
We can also apply In situ methods like In situ chemical reduction (ISCR) and In situ bioremediation (ISB) which is carried out in situ, with contaminated soil and groundwater still in place, however, remediated to minimize the movement of contaminants and avoid human exposure.
Clean-up and remediation of uranium contaminated sites can be done in different ways. What kind of treatment is required, where is the contamination, and what is available will determine what procedure is used. Physical excision, chemical stabilisation, bioremediation and in-situ disposal. Each technique has pros and cons and sometimes it takes a combination of approaches to get as much cleaning as you need.
[1] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2018). Uranium.
[2] U.S. Department of Energy. (2018). Uranium Contamination Remediation.
[3] E.J. Calvo, J.M. López, M.A. Fernández, A.R. González, and J.A. Díaz. (2003). Removal of uranium from natural waters by chelating agents. Water Research 37(14), 3403-3409.
[4] S.N. Patel, J.K. Bhatt, and A.K. Srivastava. (2018). Bioremediation of Uranium Contaminated Soils: A Review. Intern
Regulation of uranium contamination
Controlling uranium contamination is one way of guarding human health and the environment from the risks of the radioactive substance. The national and international law, and regulation, for uranium handling, handling and disposal, water testing, monitoring and remediation of contaminated sites.
The main federal regulation of the use and disposal of uranium is the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (the law that empowers the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to govern the civilian use of nuclear energy [1]). This statute has created the rules for the disposal of low-level radioactive wastes such as uranium waste [2] by the NRC. The NRC also has license, safety and security policies in place for commercial nuclear power plants and other nuclear facilities.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also has a role to regulate uranium contamination, as part of its Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) regulations [3]. RCRA governs the handling and disposal of toxic waste, including uranium waste; the SDWA regulates a permissible concentration of uranium in public drinking water.
In the world, at least, there is the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to regulate and prevent contamination of uranium. Several safety rules and procedures have been published by the IAEA to regulate the treatment and disposal of radioactive wastes and the shielding of human and environmental health against ionising radiation [4].
These laws and regulations (at the national and international level) govern how uranium is managed, handled and disposed of, as well as how it is tested, monitored and cleaned up from contaminated locations. These are measures to ensure human health and the environment from the ill effects of uranium contamination. Such laws need to be complied with if uranium can be safely and responsibly managed, and if it is not to harm human and environmental health. Note: Uranium laws and regulations might differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and this is a subject that should be researched very carefully at each jurisdiction to make sure that you’re fully aware.
[1] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2019). The Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
[2] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2019). Low-level radioactive waste disposal regulations.
[3] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2019). Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA).
[4] International Atomic Energy Agency. (2019). Radiation safety and security. Retrieved from https://www.iaea.org/
Case studies of uranium contamination
Remediating sites contaminated with uraniumis a complex process that requires a thorough understanding of the types of contaminants present, the nature and extent of the contamination, and the characteristics of the affected environment. There are several methods that can be used to clean up and remediate sites contaminated with uranium, including physical removal, chemical treatment, and bioremediation.
Physical removal methods involve removing contaminated soil, sediment, or other materials from the site, and disposing of them in a manner that will not pose a risk to human health or the environment. This method is commonly used for cleaning up large-scale contamination, such as at former uranium mining and milling sites [1]. However, it is also one of the most costly and disruptive options.
Chemical treatment methods involve using various chemical reagents to change the form of the uranium contaminants so that they can be more easily removed or made less hazardous. For example, chemical stabilization can be used to immobilize contaminants in place, reducing the risk of exposure and making them less mobile. This method is commonly used to treat soils and sediments that contain low levels of contaminants [2].
Bioremediation is a type of biological treatment that uses microorganisms to break down or remove contaminants from the environment. This method can be used to remove uranium contaminants from soil and water, and it has been shown to be effective in reducing uranium levels in contaminated environments [3].
There are several methods that can be used to clean up and remediate sites contaminated with uranium. Physical removal methods are commonly used for large-scale contamination, chemical treatment methods can be used to change the form of the contaminants and make them less hazardous, and bioremediation is an effective method for removing uranium contaminants from soil and water using microorganisms. It is important to note that the choice of remediation method will depend on the specific characteristics of the site and the contaminants present. The choice may also be guided by the technical feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and long-term sustainability of each method. A thorough investigation, site assessment and planning, as well as stakeholder involvement, is essential to select the appropriate remediation approach that ensures the protection of human health and the environment.
[1] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2017). Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act: Fact Sheet.
[2] U.S. Department of Energy. (2017). Technical Measures for Remediation of Contaminated Sites.
[3] U.S. Department of Energy. (2015). Bioremediation of Uranium in Soils and Groundwater. Retrieved from https://www.osti.gov/
Public perception and communication about uranium contamination
The public perception and communication about uranium contamination can play a significant role in shaping public understanding, attitudes, and behaviors towards contamination issues. Factors such as trust in authorities, awareness of the risks and benefits of uranium, and the perceived effectiveness of management and remediation efforts can all influence public perceptions and responses to contamination issues.
One of the key factors that influences public perception and communication about uranium contamination is trust in authorities. When authorities are perceived as trustworthy and credible, the public is more likely to believe their messages and take action to address contamination issues. However, when authorities are perceived as untrustworthy, the public may be more skeptical and less likely to take action [1].
Another important factor that influences public perception and communication about uranium contamination is awareness of the risks and benefits of uranium. When the public has a good understanding of the risks and benefits of uranium, they are more likely to have a balanced perspective on the issue, and to make informed decisions about contamination management and remediation [2]. On the other hand, when the public lacks awareness of the risks and benefits, they may be more likely to adopt fear-based attitudes towards uranium, which can lead to public opposition to management and remediation efforts.
Effective communication strategies can also play an important role in shaping public perceptions and responses to uranium contamination. This can involve the use of clear, accurate, and accessible language to explain the risks and benefits of uranium, and to communicate the actions being taken to address contamination issues. The use of visual aids and other multimedia materials can also be effective in communicating key messages to the public. Additionally, involving the public in decision-making processes, such as through public consultation and stakeholder engagement, can be an effective way of building trust, fostering understanding, and shaping public perceptions of uranium contamination [3].
Public perception and communication play a critical role in shaping public understanding, attitudes, and behaviors towards uranium contamination. Factors such as trust in authorities, awareness of the risks and benefits of uranium, and the effectiveness of communication strategies can all influence public perceptions and responses to contamination issues. To effectively manage and remediate uranium contamination, it is important for authorities to consider these factors, and to develop effective strategies for communicating with the public and engaging stakeholders in the decision-making process.
[1] J. A. Leurck, R. T. E. Mills, and J. L. Gibson, “Trust in Government and Public Support for Nuclear Power,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 2012.
[2] S. K. M. Sjöberg, “Perceived risks and benefits of nuclear energy: a study of laypeople’s risk perceptions,” Journal of Risk Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 337–354, 2009.
[3] N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson, P. Slovic, and J. S. Marsh, “The Social Amplification of Risk,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003.
[2] S. K. M. Sjöberg, “Perceived risks and benefits of nuclear energy: a study of laypeople’s risk perceptions,” Journal of Risk Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 337–354, 2009.
[3] N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson, P. Slovic, and J. S. Marsh, “The Social Amplification of Risk,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003.
Future research on uranium contamination
There is ongoing research in the field of uranium contamination to address the various challenges associated with detecting, measuring, and remediating uranium contamination. New technologies and approaches are being developed to improve the accuracy and efficiency of testing methods, as well as to reduce the risks and costs of remediation.
One area of current research on uranium contamination is the development of new and improved testing methods. For example, researchers are working on developing more sensitive and specific analytical methods for detecting and measuring low levels of uranium in different matrices, such as water, soil, and air [1]. Additionally, new technologies such as portable analytical instruments, non-destructive imaging, and molecular biology-based methods are being developed to improve the speed and accuracy of testing [2].
Another area of current research on uranium contamination is the development of new technologies for remediating contaminated sites. For example, researchers are working on developing new methods for immobilizing or removing uranium from contaminated soils and water, such as the use of natural and engineered biosorbents [3]. Additionally, new technologies such as soil washing, thermal desorption, and phytoremediation are also being studied for their potential to remove or reduce uranium levels in contaminated environments [4].
Moreover, Future research is focusing on the use of nanotechnology, which offers a wide range of advantages in terms of cost, efficiency and environmental friendliness. For example, using nanoparticles as sorbents, catalysts, or adsorbents in aqueous systems has been reported to be an efficient method for removing and concentrating uranium ions in water [5].
Current and future research on uranium contamination are focused on developing new technologies and approaches to improve the detection, measurement, and remediation of uranium contamination. These efforts aim to improve the accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of uranium contamination management and to reduce the risks associated with uranium contamination.
[1] K.J. McClellan, R.N. Young, L.G. Davis, and D.M. Duker, "Development and Evaluation of Analytical Methods for Low-Level Uranium Analysis," Journal of Environmental Quality, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1882-1891, 2015.
[2] R.F. Zielinski, "Advances in Portable Analytical Instrumentation for the Measurement of Uranium and Other Radionuclides," Journal of Environmental Monitoring, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 3249-3268, 2016.
[3] S.L. Fan and R.M. Maier, "Biosorption of Uranium by Microorganisms and Their Biomass," Biotechnology Advances, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 89-104, 2011.
[4] J.R.B. Weber, A.F. Leist, and T.A. Gremillion, "Innovative Technologies for Remediating Uranium Contamination in Soils and Groundwater," Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 235, pp. 1-59, 2014.
[5] L. Wang, X. Sun, and X. Liu, "Nanoparticles for Uranium Remediation: A Review," Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 312, pp. 31-40, 2016.
Share this research on social media
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
See all Research on Uranium